Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074982›Full record

SynthesisClinical and molecular hepatology2024

Prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hee Yeon Kim, Jung Hwan Yu, Young Eun Chon, Seung Up Kim, Mi Na Kim, Ji Won Han, Han Ah Lee, Young-Joo Jin, Jihyun An, Miyoung Choi and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Regulatory Role of Iron Transporter SLC39A13 in Liver Fibrosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hee Yeon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Hwan YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Young Eun ChonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Seung Up KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Na KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Won HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Han Ah LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Joo JinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Jihyun AnDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Miyoung ChoiDivision of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare, Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsAlthough important, clinically significant liver fibrosis is often overlooked in the general population. We aimed to examine the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis using noninvasive tests (NITs) in the general population.

methodsWe collected data from four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) from inception to June 13, 2023. Original articles reporting the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis in the general population were included. The Stata metaprop function was used to obtain the pooled prevalence of liver fibrosis with NITs in the general population.

resultsWe screened 6,429 articles and included 45 eligible studies that reported the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis in the general population. The prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis, using the high probability cutoff of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.7%). The prevalence of significant liver fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis, assessed using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) among the general population, was 7.3% (95% CI, 5.9-8.8%), 3.5% (95% CI, 2.7-4.5), and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.8-1.8%), respectively. Region-based subgroup analysis revealed that the highest prevalence of advanced fibrosis using the high probability cutoff of the FIB-4 index was observed in the American region. Furthermore, the American region exhibited the highest prevalence of significant liver fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis, using VCTE.

conclusionPreviously undiagnosed clinically significant liver fibrosis is found in the general population through NITs. Future research is necessary to stratify the risk in the general population.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesLiver CirrhosisHumansPrevalenceLiver fibrosisMeta-analysisPopulation SurveillanceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39074982
PMCPMC11493351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.