ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Serum stratifin measurement is useful for evaluating disease severity and outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of combinatorial mRNA biomarkers for non-invasive detection and therapy monitoring of oral and oropharyngeal SCC.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Analysis of Stratifin Expression and Proteome Variation in a Rat Model of Acute Lung Injury.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerum levels of stratifin (SFN), a member of the 14-3-3 protein family, increase in patients with drug-induced lung injury associated with diffuse alveolar damage. Therefore, we hypothesised that SFN levels would be higher in those experiencing acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD). A secondary analysis was also planned to determine whether SFN levels could discriminate survival in those with AE.
methodsThirty-two patients with clinically stable ILD (CS-ILD) and 22 patients with AE-ILD were examined to assess whether high serum SFN levels were associated with AE-ILD and whether SFN levels reflected disease severity or prognosis in patients with AE-ILD.
resultsSerum SFN levels were higher in the AE-ILD group than in the CS-ILD group (8.4 ± 7.6 vs. 1.3 ± 1.2 ng/mL, p < 0.001). The cut-off value of the serum SFN concentration for predicting 90-day and 1-year survival was 6.6 ng/mL. SFN levels were higher in patients who died within 90 days and 1 year than in patients who survived beyond these time points (13.5 ± 8.7 vs. 5.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL; p = 0.011 and 13.1 ± 7.5 vs. 3.1 ± 1.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001, respectively) in the AE-ILD group. When this cut-off value was used, the 90-day and 1-year survival rates were significantly better in the population below the cut-off value than in those above the cut-off value (p = 0.0017 vs. p < 0.0001).
conclusionsHigh serum SFN levels are associated with AE-ILD and can discriminate survival in patients with AE-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.