Evidence mapPaperPMID 39075715Full record

ReviewJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025

Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.

Michael P Cary, Sophia Bessias, Jonathan McCall, Michael J Pencina, Siobahn D Grady, Kay Lytle, Nicoleta J Economou-Zavlanos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysing the Suitability of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and the Role of AI Governance.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael P CaryDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7966-7515
Sophia BessiasDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jonathan McCallDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Michael J PencinaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Siobahn D GradyNorth Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kay LytleDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-1501
Nicoleta J Economou-ZavlanosDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of health equity by design encompasses a multifaceted approach that integrates actions aimed at eliminating biased, unjust, and correctable differences among groups of people as a fundamental element in the design of algorithms. As algorithmic tools are increasingly integrated into clinical practice at multiple levels, nurses are uniquely positioned to address challenges posed by the historical marginalization of minority groups and its intersections with the use of "big data" in healthcare settings; however, a coherent framework is needed to ensure that nurses receive appropriate training in these domains and are equipped to act effectively. PURPOSE: We introduce the Bias Elimination for Fair AI in Healthcare (BE FAIR) framework, a comprehensive strategic approach that incorporates principles of health equity by design, for nurses to employ when seeking to mitigate bias and prevent discriminatory practices arising from the use of clinical algorithms in healthcare. By using examples from a "real-world" AI governance framework, we aim to initiate a wider discourse on equipping nurses with the skills needed to champion the BE FAIR initiative.

methodsDrawing on principles recently articulated by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, we conducted a critical examination of the concept of health equity by design. We also reviewed recent literature describing the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare as well as their potential for advancing health equity. Building on this context, we describe the BE FAIR framework, which has the potential to enable nurses to take a leadership role within health systems by implementing a governance structure to oversee the fairness and quality of clinical algorithms. We then examine leading frameworks for promoting health equity to inform the operationalization of BE FAIR within a local AI governance framework.

resultsThe application of the BE FAIR framework within the context of a working governance system for clinical AI technologies demonstrates how nurses can leverage their expertise to support the development and deployment of clinical algorithms, mitigating risks such as bias and promoting ethical, high-quality care powered by big data and AI technologies. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: As health systems learn how well-intentioned clinical algorithms can potentially perpetuate health disparities, we have an opportunity and an obligation to do better. New efforts empowering nurses to advocate for BE FAIR, involving them in AI governance, data collection methods, and the evaluation of tools intended to reduce bias, mark important steps in achieving equitable healthcare for all.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmpowermentHealth EquityHumansartificial intelligenceethicsHealth equitynursingsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39075715
PMCPMC11771545

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.