Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076280›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Healing the Ischaemic Heart: A Critical Review of Stem Cell Therapies.

Devin Tonkin, Anthony Yee-Goh, Rajesh Katare

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devin TonkinDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, 9010 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Anthony Yee-GohDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, 9010 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rajesh KatareDepartment of Physiology, HeartOtago, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, 9010 Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Current pharmaceutical treatments focus on delaying, rather than preventing disease progression. The only curative treatment available is orthotopic heart transplantation, which is greatly limited by a lack of available donors and the possibility for immune rejection. As a result, novel therapies are consistently being sought to improve the quality and duration of life of those suffering from IHD. Stem cell therapies have garnered attention globally owing to their potential to replace lost cardiac cells, regenerate the ischaemic myocardium and to release protective paracrine factors. Despite recent advances in regenerative cardiology, one of the biggest challenges in the clinical translation of cell-based therapies is determining the most efficacious cell type for repair. Multiple cell types have been investigated in clinical trials; with inconsistent methodologies and isolation protocols making it difficult to draw strong conclusions. This review provides an overview of IHD focusing on pathogenesis and complications, followed by a summary of different stem cells which have been trialled for use in the treatment of IHD, and ends by exploring the known mechanisms by which stem cells mediate their beneficial effects on ischaemic myocardium.

Indexed as

adult stem cellsclinical trialsischaemic heart diseaseparacrine mechanismspluripotent stem cellsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID39076280
PMCPMC11273058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.