ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Optional Revascularization Strategies for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immediate versus staged complete revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention is the main strategy of revascularization and has been shown to improve outcomes in some patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, multivessel disease (MVD), a common condition in these patients, is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to single-vessel disease. Despite intervention being a standard treatment for coronary artery disease, optimal strategies and timings for patients with STEMI and MVD remain unclear. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have investigated this topic; however, many current conclusions are based on observational studies. Furthermore, clinical guidelines regarding the management of patients with STEMI and MVD contain conflicting recommendations. Therefore, we aimed to compile relevant studies and newly available evidence-based medicines to explore the most effective approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.