Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076362›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Prestige bias in cultural evolutionary dynamics.

Saar Egozi, Yoav Ram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Weak individual preferences stabilize culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Prestige bias in cultural evolutionary dynamics.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saar EgoziSchool of Computer Science, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-3608
Yoav RamSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9653-4458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If the traits of more successful individuals are more likely to be adopted, the resulting cultural transmission is described as success biased. In contrast, if the traits of 'prestigious' individuals-those who have already been copied many times-are more likely to be adopted, this is described as prestige-biased cultural transmission. In this case, prestige can be a convenient proxy for success. However, it is unclear how success and prestige biases interact to determine the outcome of cultural evolutionary dynamics. Here, we aim to clarify this using mathematical analysis and stochastic simulations. We find analytic approximations to the stochastic role-model choice process that facilitate the mathematical analysis and reduce the computational complexity of simulations. Approximations are given to the fixation probability and the fixation time of an invading cultural trait in different environments. Our results show that success bias effectively plays the role of natural selection, whereas prestige bias effectively plays the role of genetic drift. Prestige bias, which may be strong in highly social communities, also accelerates the evolutionary dynamics, as expected in a rich-get-richer process. These results signify a step forward in understanding how different cultural transmission biases interact.

Indexed as

cultural evolutioncultural transmissionevolutionary modelinfluenceprestige

Identifiers

PMID39076362
PMCPMC11285825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.