ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
The Remaining Conundrum of the Role of the Na
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revising NHE-1: From Cardiac Homeostasis to Heart Failure and Future Drug Development.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Review
- Inhibition of Pyk2 prevents Cx43 remodeling and cardiomyocyte injury during hypoxic and adrenergic stress.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial Transport Proteins in Cardiovascular Diseases: Metabolic Gatekeepers, Pathogenic Mediators and Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiomyocyte-specific NHE1 overexpression confers protection against myocardial infarction during hyperglycemia.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Upregulation of Na/H Exchanger in Astrogliosis and Early Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis.Aging and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.