ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Angiogenesis in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection: A Literature Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress-Induced DNA Damage Response Pathways in Aortic Disease: Implications for Inflammation and Vascular Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Semaphorin 3A protects against thoracic aortic aneurysm dissection by suppressing aortic angiogenesis.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Expression patterns and clinical relevance of H19, miR-181a-3p, and TGF-β in ascending aortic aneurysms: a comparative analysis of human aortic tissue.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of the White Blood Cells Count for the Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Overexpression of αVβ3 Integrin in an Aortic Aneurysm Murine Model: Confirmation inEJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies two fibroblast subtypes and a Trem2Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Olfactory Receptors and Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Disease Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (AA/AD) are critical aortic diseases with a hidden onset and sudden rupture, usually resulting in an inevitable death. Several pro- and anti-angiogenic factors that induce new capillary formation in the existing blood vessels regulate angiogenesis. In addition, aortic disease mainly manifests as the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells of the adventitia vasa vasorum. An increasing number of studies have shown that angiogenesis is a characteristic change that may promote AA/AD occurrence, progression, and rupture. Furthermore, neocapillaries are leaky and highly susceptible to injury by cytotoxic agents, which promote extracellular matrix remodeling, facilitate inflammatory cell infiltration, and release coagulation factors and proteases within the wall. Mechanistically, inflammation, hypoxia, and angiogenic factor signaling play important roles in angiogenesis in AA/AD under the complex interaction of multiple cell types, such as smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, mast cells, and neutrophils. Therefore, based on current evidence, this review aims to discuss the manifestation, pathological role, and underlying mechanisms of angiogenesis involved in AA/AD, providing insights into the prevention and treatment of AA/AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.