ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Value of Imaging in the Non-Invasive Prediction of Recurrence after Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Up-to-Date Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography assessment of left atrial posterior wall morphology predicts atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Impact of NT-proBNP reduction on recurrence after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial roof ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Combining clinical and left atrial electromechanical remodelling data: potential to improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcome prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation (CA) is the first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, the risk of recurrence associated with CA treatment should not be ignored. Therefore, the preoperative identification of patients at risk of recurrence is essential for identifying patients who will benefit from non-invasive surgery. Echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential for the preoperative non-invasive prediction of AF recurrence after CA. Compared to laboratory examinations and other examination methods, these modalities can identify structural changes in the heart and assess functional variations. Accordingly, in past studies, morphological features, quantitative parameters, and imaging information of the heart, as assessed by echocardiography, CT, and MRI, have been used to predict AF recurrence after CA noninvasively. This review summarizes and discusses the current research on echocardiography, CT, MRI, and machine learning for predicting AF recurrence following CA. Recommendations for future research are also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.