ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Efficacy and Safety of Deferred Stenting in Geriatric Patients with STEMI and High Thrombus Burden.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Management Strategies for Intracoronary High Thrombus Burden in Patients With STEMI: A Practical Experience and Literature Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deferred stenting has been recognized as beneficial for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) accompanied by a high thrombus burden. Nevertheless, its efficacy and safety specifically in geriatric STEMI patients remain to be elucidated. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap and assess the potential advantages of deferred stenting in an older patient cohort. Methods: In this study, 208 geriatric patients (aged Results: In the deferred stenting group, the stents used were significantly larger in diameter and shorter in length compared to those in the immediate stenting group ( Conclusions: Deferred stenting for geriatric patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden demonstrates significant clinical benefits. This approach not only reduces the incidence of distal embolism in the IRA, but also enhances myocardial tissue perfusion and preserves cardiac ejection function. Moreover, deferred stenting has proven to be safe in this patient population, indicating its potential as a preferred treatment strategy in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.