Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077438›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2024

Effect of different synbiotic administration methods on growth, carcass characteristics, ileum histomorphometry, and blood biochemistry of Cobb-500 broilers.

Arjun Acharya, Bhuminand Devkota, Hom Bahadur Basnet, Shanker Raj Barsila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protective Effect of Synbiotic Supplementation AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. MitigatingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arjun AcharyaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Fodder Production, Agriculture and Forestry University, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Rampur, Chitwan, 00977 Nepal.
Bhuminand DevkotaDepartment of Theriogenology, Agriculture and Forestry University, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Rampur Chitwan, 00977 Nepal.
Hom Bahadur BasnetDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Agriculture and Forestry University, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Rampur Chitwan, 00977 Nepal.
Shanker Raj BarsilaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Fodder Production, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: To combat enteric infections and antibiotic resistance in the poultry industry, researchers seek alternatives such as probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics as growth promoters. Synbiotics support probiotic growth through the supply of essential nutrients. The study's objectives were to assess the most effective delivery methods for synbiotics and evaluate their growth, histomorphometric, and hematological impacts on Cobb-500 broilers. Materials and Methods: Two studies, independently conducted, employed a completely randomized design. One hundred and eighty viable eggs in the first trial were assigned to three groups: Control (T1), sterile water (T2), and synbiotic in sterile water (T3). On the 21 Results: The initial experiment's results revealed a decrease in hatchability, slight weight increase, and significant intestinal morphological changes with the use of an Conclusion: Using the

Indexed as

growth performancegut healthhistomorphometryin ovosynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID39077438
PMCPMC11283621

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.