Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077480›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Clinical and Prognostic Value of Exaggerated Blood Pressure Response to Exercise.

Cesare Cuspidi, Andrea Faggiano, Elisa Gherbesi, Carla Sala, Guido Grassi, Marijana Tadic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cesare CuspidiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-478X
Andrea FaggianoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Elisa GherbesiDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Carla SalaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Guido GrassiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Marijana TadicDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "Dr. Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje'', 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypertensive response to exercise testing, defined as exaggerated blood pressure response (EBPR), has been documented to be independently associated with unhealthy conditions, carrying an increased risk of future hypertension, cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. In treated hypertensives, EBPR is a marker of uncontrolled hypertension, a condition previously undetected by office blood pressure (BP) measurements at rest; EBPR may also detect masked hypertension, a phenotype characterized by normal BP values in the medical environment but elevated home or ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive and up-dated information on the clinical importance of EBPR targeting the following issues: (I) definition and prevalence; (II) underlying mechanisms; (III) clinical correlates and association with subclinical organ damage; (IV) predictive value; (V) clinical decision making.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseexaggerated blood pressure response to exercisehypertensiontarget organ damage

Identifiers

PMID39077480
PMCPMC11263987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.