Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077543›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

A Machine Learning Framework for Diagnosing and Predicting the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease.

Aikeliyaer Ainiwaer, Wen Qing Hou, Kaisaierjiang Kadier, Rena Rehemuding, Peng Fei Liu, Halimulati Maimaiti, Lian Qin, Xiang Ma, Jian Guo Dai

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05018715 (Research on the Diagnostic Value of Machine Learning Model Based on Clinical Data in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05018715 unknown statusnot on this map

Research on the Diagnostic Value of Machine Learning Model Based on Clinical Data in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorXiang MaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled600ConditionsCoronary Heart Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction, AnginaArmsMachine learning model diagnosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aikeliyaer AiniwaerDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Wen Qing HouCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, 832003 Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Kaisaierjiang KadierDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Rena RehemudingDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Peng Fei LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Halimulati MaimaitiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Lian QinDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Xiang MaDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 830011 Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Jian Guo DaiCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, 832003 Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although machine learning (ML)-based prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD) has gained increasing attention, assessment of the severity of suspected CAD in symptomatic patients remains challenging. Methods: The training set for this study consisted of 284 retrospective participants, while the test set included 116 prospectively enrolled participants from whom we collected 53 baseline variables and coronary angiography results. The data was pre-processed with outlier processing and One-Hot coding. In the first stage, we constructed a ML model that used baseline information to predict the presence of CAD with a dichotomous model. In the second stage, baseline information was used to construct ML regression models for predicting the severity of CAD. The non-CAD population was included, and two different scores were used as output variables. Finally, statistical analysis and SHAP plot visualization methods were employed to explore the relationship between baseline information and CAD. Results: The study included 269 CAD patients and 131 healthy controls. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model exhibited the best performance amongst the different models for predicting CAD, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.728 (95% CI 0.623-0.824). The main correlates were left ventricular ejection fraction, homocysteine, and hemoglobin ( Conclusions: This data-driven approach provides a foundation for the risk stratification and severity assessment of CAD. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov protocol registration system (number NCT05018715).

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseGENSINI scoremachine learningSYNTAX score

Identifiers

PMID39077543
PMCPMC11264126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.