ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
Coronary Physiology: Delivering Precision Medicine?
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological Characterization of Coronary Endotypes: Potential Links with Myocardial Ischemia.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Beat-to-beat coronary wave intensity analysis: implications of backward waves originating from microvascular.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evolving Diagnostic and Management Advances in Coronary Heart Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary physiological assessment is now widely used to assess epicardial coronary lesions in cath lab. Based on clinical evidence, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard method to select whether epicardial coronary lesions need revascularization. While additional epicardial indexes, such as instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), are also used for revascularization decision-making, several indexes are now also available to explore the coronary microcirculation. Therefore, coronary physiological assessment now allows to explore the entire coronary tree and offer the potential of precision medicine for patients affected by coronary artery disease (CAD). This paper will provide review of the epicardial and microvascular indexes available for the assessment of coronary physiology. More specifically, the already demonstrated contributions of these indexes in the management of CAD and the role they could play in precision medicine will be reviewed with special emphasis on chronic coronary syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.