ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
The gut microbial differences between pre-released and wild red deer: Firmicutes abundance may affect wild adaptation after release.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of morphology and gut microbiome underlying trophic niche differentiation in three stomatopod species.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of oral and cloacal administration of Lactobacillus probiotics and postbiotics against Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genome-resolved analysis of colonization factor repertoires reveals ecological stratification in cervid gut microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Profiling of the Fecal Bacteriome, Mycobiome, and Protist Community in Wild Versus Captive (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Cultivated Gut Microbiota of Roe Deer and Red Deer in Central Poland Forest.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Gut Morphological Structure-Microbial Characteristics inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Variations in the Fecal Microbiota of Red Deer in Relation to the Hunting Area in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region, Italy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota composition among three captive hornbills.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insufficient density of red deer has affected the stability of forest ecosystems and the recovery of large carnivores (represented by Amur tiger). Conservation translocations from captivity to the wild has become an important way to restore the red deer populations. However, the difference in gut microbes between pre-release and wild red deer may affect the feeding adaptability of red deer after release. In this study, we clarified the differences in gut microbes between pre-released and wild red deer and screened the key gut microbes of the red deer involved in feeding by using metagenomic sequencing and feeding analysis. The results showed that the microbial difference between pre-released and wild red deer was mainly related to Firmicutes represented by Eubacteriales and Clostridia, and Firmicutes abundance in pre-released red deer (68.23%) was significantly lower than that of wild red deer (74.91%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.