Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077851›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2024

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Conduct and Results of CLEAR Outcomes Trial.

Abhayjit Singh, Luke J Laffin, Ashish Sarraju, A Michael Lincoff, Stephen J Nicholls, LeAnne Bloedon, William J Sasiela, Na Li, Paula Robinson, Stephanie Kelly and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Bempedoic Acid: A Review in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Statin-Intolerant Patients.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abhayjit SinghSection of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Luke J LaffinSection of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-792X
Ashish SarrajuSection of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
A Michael LincoffCleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Stephen J NichollsVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9668-4368
LeAnne BloedonEsperion Therapeutics Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
William J SasielaEsperion Therapeutics Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Na LiEsperion Therapeutics Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Paula RobinsonEsperion Therapeutics Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Stephanie KellyEsperion Therapeutics Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Denise MasonCleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Steven E NissenSection of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

The CLEAR Outcomes trial was funded by Esperion Therapeutics.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research. CLEAR Outcomes investigated the effect of bempedoic acid (BA) versus placebo in 13 970 patients with statin intolerance and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. BA reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) by 13%. CLEAR Outcomes began before and continued for 2.7 years after the start of the pandemic.

methodsThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient disposition, adverse events, and major adverse CV events (MACE) in CLEAR Outcomes was assessed.

resultsRates of severe infection, hospitalization, or first MACE associated with a positive COVID-19 test were low and balanced between treatment groups. Rates of all-cause death, non-CV death, and undetermined death increased in the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic period, while rates of CV death with a known etiology remained stable. A sensitivity analysis excluding undetermined deaths occurring after the onset of the pandemic from the CV death designation yielded hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93) for the primary endpoint and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76-1.16) for the secondary endpoint of CV death, compared with 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88-1.24), respectively, in the original analysis.

conclusionThe CLEAR Outcomes trial continued uninterrupted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain trial endpoints may have been impacted by the pandemic. Specifically, the classification of undetermined deaths as CV deaths may have attenuated the effect of BA on key efficacy endpoints.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCOVID-19Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsbempedoic acidcardiovascular outcomesclinical trialCOVID‐19hyperlipidemiastatin intolerance

Identifiers

PMID39077851
PMCPMC11287323

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.