ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024
A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteogenomics in human populations.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of studies using ADNI data (2023 to June 2025).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling of Brain Cells in Newborn Rats Following Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Increased transmembrane protein 119 (TMEM119) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease suggest early microglial involvement.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPlasma has been proposed as an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for measuring Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, but no studies have analyzed in detail which biofluid is more informative for genetics studies of AD.
methodEleven proteins associated with AD (α-synuclein, apolipoprotein E [apoE], CLU, GFAP, GRN, NfL, NRGN, SNAP-25, TREM2, VILIP-1, YKL-40) were assessed in plasma (n = 2317) and CSF (n = 3107). Both plasma and CSF genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses were performed for each protein, followed by functional annotation. Additional characterization for each biomarker included calculation of correlations and predictive power.
resultsEighteen plasma protein quantitative train loci (pQTLs) associated with 10 proteins and 16 CSF pQTLs associated with 9 proteins were identified. Plasma and CSF shared some genetic loci, but protein levels between tissues correlated weakly. CSF protein levels better associated with AD compared to plasma. DISCUSSION: The present results indicate that CSF is more informative than plasma for genetic studies in AD. HIGHLIGHTS: The identification of novel protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Plasma and CSF levels of neurodegeneration-related proteins correlated weakly. CSF is more informative than plasma for genetic studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neurofilament light (NfL), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) tend to show relatively strong inter-tissue associations. A novel signal in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) region was identified, which is an eQTL for APOC1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.