Evidence mapPaperPMID 39077889Full record

Observational studyJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2024

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in elderly patients with major depressive disorder in real-world clinical practice: Results from the RELIEVE study.

M Di Nicola, M Adair, A Rieckmann, Cronquist Christensen M

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03555136 (Real-life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03555136 completednot on this map

Real-life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Non-interventional, Multi-national, Prospective Cohort Study to Assess Real-life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine

TypeobservationalSponsorH. Lundbeck A/SRan2017 to 2021Enrolled992ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsVortioxetine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Di NicolaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-0426
M AdairH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-1976
A RieckmannH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Cronquist Christensen MH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-7223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData demonstrating the real-world, long-term effectiveness of vortioxetine in elderly patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) are clinically useful to confirm findings from randomized trials.

methodsRELIEVE was a multinational, 24-week, observational, prospective study in outpatients with MDD initiating vortioxetine treatment in routine care settings (NCT03555136). Here, we report data from a subgroup of 130 patients aged ⩾ 65 years. The primary study outcome was changed from baseline in patient functioning assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Other clinical outcomes included depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity [CGI-S]), cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) and symptoms (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression-5 item [PDQ-D-5]), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels [EQ-5D-5L]).

resultsClinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in patient functioning, depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and HRQoL were observed at week 24. Least squares mean SDS, PHQ-9, CGI-S, PDQ-D-5, DSST, and EQ-5D-5L scores improved from baseline by 6.5, 5.7, 1.2, 3.2, 4.4, and 0.11 points, respectively (

conclusionsConsistent with previous clinical studies of vortioxetine, this study supports the effectiveness and safety of vortioxetine in treating elderly patients with MDD in a real-world setting over a 6-month period. Patients showed clinically relevant and sustained improvements in psychosocial functioning, depressive symptoms, and cognitive function after receiving vortioxetine, which was generally well tolerated. Main study limitations include the open-label study design and lack of a placebo or comparator group.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderPractice Patterns, Physicians'VortioxetineAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsCognitionFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsVortioxetineeffectivenesselderlyfunctioningMajor depressive disordervortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID39077889
PMCPMC11290038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.