Evidence mapPaperPMID 39078632Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Medication Optimization Protocol Efficacy for Geriatric Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kenya Ie, Masanori Hirose, Tsubasa Sakai, Iori Motohashi, Mari Aihara, Takuya Otsuki, Ayako Tsuboya, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Hikari Hashi, Eisuke Inoue and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Error in Figure 1.JAMA network open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kenya IeDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masanori HiroseDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tsubasa SakaiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Iori MotohashiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mari AiharaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takuya OtsukiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ayako TsuboyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsumotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hikari HashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eisuke InoueShowa University Research Administration Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki TakahashiDivision of Medical Informatics, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eiko KomiyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuka ItohDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Reiko MachinoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoya TsuchidaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Steven M AlbertDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yoshiyuki OhiraDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chiaki OkuseDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is currently no consensus on clinically effective interventions for polypharmacy among older inpatients. Objective: To evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary team-based medication optimization on survival, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization in older inpatients with polypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 internal medicine inpatient wards within a community hospital in Japan. Participants included medical inpatients 65 years or older who were receiving 5 or more regular medications. Enrollment took place between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2023 to May 2024. Intervention: The participants were randomly assigned to receive either an intervention for medication optimization or usual care including medication reconciliation. The intervention consisted of a medication review using the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria, followed by a medication optimization proposal for participants and their attending physicians developed by a multidisciplinary team. On discharge, the medication optimization summary was sent to patients' primary care physicians and community pharmacists. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death, unscheduled hospital visits, and rehospitalization within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the number of prescribed medications, falls, and adverse events. Results: Between May 21, 2019, and March 14, 2022, 442 participants (mean [SD] age, 81.8 [7.1] years; 223 [50.5%] women) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 215) and usual care (n = 227). The intervention group had a significantly lower percentage of patients with 1 or more potentially inappropriate medications than the usual care group at discharge (26.2% vs 33.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.94]; P = .03), at 6 months (27.7% vs 37.5%; adjusted OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.86]; P = .01), and at 12 months (26.7% vs 37.4%; adjusted OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P = .007). The primary composite outcome occurred in 106 participants (49.3%) in the intervention group and 117 (51.5%) in the usual care group (stratified hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75-1.27]). Adverse events were similar between each group (123 [57.2%] in the intervention group and 135 [59.5%] in the usual care group). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of older inpatients with polypharmacy, the multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention did not reduce death, unscheduled hospital visits, or rehospitalization within 12 months. The intervention was effective in reducing the number of medications with no significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes, even among older inpatients with polypharmacy. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000035265.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInpatientsJapanMaleMedication ReconciliationPatient Care TeamPatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID39078632
PMCPMC11289701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.