Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081012›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2024

Trimester-specific rate of gestational weight loss or gain and birth size: differences by prepregnancy BMI.

Janne Boone-Heinonen, Dang Dinh, Rachel Springer, Shuling Liu, Jean O'Malley, Natalie A Rosenquist, Teresa Schmidt, Jonathan M Snowden, Sarah-Truclinh Tran, Kimberly K Vesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janne Boone-HeinonenOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-0545
Dang DinhDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rachel SpringerDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Shuling LiuDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jean O'MalleyOCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Natalie A RosenquistOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Teresa SchmidtOCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jonathan M SnowdenOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sarah-Truclinh TranOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kimberly K VescoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

PROMISE: PReventing Obesity through healthy Maternal gestational weight gain In the Safety nEtR01DK118484 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BOONE-HEINONEN, JANNE, SNOWDEN, JONATHAN M · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK118484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to estimate the effects of trimester-specific gestational weight gain (GWG) on small and large (compared with appropriate) for gestational age (i.e., SGA, LGA, and AGA) by prepregnancy BMI classifications.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study of pregnancies in a national network of community health care organizations, stratifying by prepregnancy BMI (n = 20,676 with normal weight; 19,156 with overweight; 11,647 with obesity class I; 5124 with obesity class II; and 3197 with obesity class III). SGA and LGA (vs. AGA) were modeled as a function of trimester 1, 2, or 3 GWG rate, previous trimester(s) GWG rate, and maternal characteristics using modified Poisson regression.

resultsGWG rates ranged from weight loss to substantial gains. GWG-LGA associations were strongest in trimester 1 (risk ratio [RR] range for 10th vs. 50th percentile GWG, across BMI categories: 0.60-0.73). GWG-SGA associations were strongest in lower BMI categories and in trimester 2; RRs were 1.62, 1.40, and 1.17 for prepregnancy normal weight, obesity class I, and obesity class III, respectively, with curvilinear associations for class II and III.

conclusionsAmong people with prepregnancy obesity class II or III, GWG rate is associated with higher LGA risk in a dose-dependent manner, including understudied ranges of weight loss, but with weak associations with SGA.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBody Mass IndexGestational Weight GainObesityWeight LossAdultCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimesters

Identifiers

PMID39081012
PMCPMC11357887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.