ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2025
Multidisciplinary management of orthopaedic trauma - are we adhering to the guidelines?
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When the Heart and Hip Collide: The Interplay Between Atrial Fibrillation and Neck of Femur Fractures.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to polytrauma patients minimises morbidity and mortality. This project assesses the extent to which British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma guidelines for the management of the frail Orthopaedic patient are currently being met.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed of all Trauma and Orthopaedic patients in multiple medical institutions over a 2-week capture period from 1 March 2022 until 14 March 2022 inclusive. Data collected included age, sex, injury, length of stay and dates of speciality input.
resultsA total of 1,050 patients were included from 27 hospitals. The median age was 80 years, with 560 (53.3%) of all fractures being neck of femur fractures. Of the 1,050 patients, 870 (82.9%) were managed operatively. The median number of different speciality involvements was 3; 645 (61.4%) had an orthogeriatric (OG) review. In major trauma centres (MTC), 93.3% had OG input, compared with 66.3% in non-MTC. The speciality with the greatest input was Radiology, with Plastics having the lowest input.
conclusionA standardised MDT approach is needed to optimise care and recovery in orthopaedic trauma patients. The difference in results regarding speciality involvement is substantial and needs to be addressed to minimise disparities in care received by this vulnerable cohort of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.