Evidence mapPaperPMID 39081664Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

The treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: from shadow to light.

Drazilova Sylvia, Koky Tomas, Macej Marian, Janicko Martin, Simkova Dagmar, Jarcuska Peter

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Drazilova Sylvia2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Koky Tomas2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Macej Marian2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
Janicko Martin2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3329-3968
Simkova DagmarDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Jarcuska Peter2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, Kosice 040 11, Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-9984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune cholestatic disease characterized by the destruction of the small intrahepatic bile ducts, which can progress to liver cirrhosis. The gold standard in the treatment of PBC is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which is indicated in all patients with PBC because it improves not only biochemical parameters but also patients' survival. An important milestone in the identification of patients at risk is the assessment of biochemical response to UDCA. Patients who respond to treatment have a lower incidence of hepatic events and better prognosis than patients who do not. Several scoring systems can be used to assess the response and identify non-responders who will benefit from second-line treatment. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is currently the only approved second-line treatment for PBC, which is effective for non-responders to UDCA therapy or patients, who have not tolerated UDCA therapy. However, OCA is contraindicated in advanced liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Moreover, pruritus may be a limiting factor for the administration of OCA. Fibrates have shown promising data supporting their use in non-responders to UDCA because they improve the biochemical parameters and elastographic findings and have possible antipruritic effects. Therefore, the idea of a triple treatment seems interesting. Clinical research is focusing on several other groups of drugs: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) δ- and α/δ agonists, non-steroidal farnesoid X receptor agonists, fibroblast growth factor 19 modulators, and inhibitors of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 1 and 4.

Indexed as

biochemical responsefibratesobeticholic acidprimary biliary cholangitisursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID39081664
PMCPMC11287753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.