ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2024
Nilotinib: Disrupting the MYC-MAX Heterocomplex.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing MK0873 as a non-covalent hTERT-Targeting compound: a proof of concept study.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Integrative Analysis of TLS-Associated Gene Signatures, Immune Infiltration and Drug Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MYC is a transcription factor crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis, and its dysregulation is associated with highly aggressive cancers. Despite being considered "undruggable" due to its unstable protein structure, MYC gains stability through its interaction with its partner protein, MAX. The MYC-MAX heterodimer orchestrates the expression of numerous genes that contribute to an oncogenic phenotype. Previous efforts to develop small molecules, disrupting the MYC-MAX interaction, have shown promise in vitro but none have gained clinical approval. Our current computer-aided study utilizes an approach to explore drug repurposing as a strategy for inhibiting the c-MYC-MAX interaction. We have focused on compounds from DrugBank library, including Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs or those under investigation for other medical conditions. First, we identified a potential druggable site on flat interface of the c-MYC protein, which served as the target for virtual screening. Using both activity-based and structure-based screening, we comprehensively assessed the entire DrugBank library. Structure-based virtual screening was performed on AutoDock Vina and Glide docking tools, while activity-based screening was performed on two independent quantitative structure-activity relationship models. We focused on the top 2% of hit molecules from all screening methods. Ultimately, we selected consensus molecules from these screenings-those that exhibited both a stable interaction with c-MYC and superior inhibitory activity against c-MYC-MAX interaction. Among the evaluated molecules, we identified a protein kinase inhibitor (tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) known as nilotinib as a promising candidate targeting c-MYC-MAX dimer. Molecular dynamic simulations demonstrated a stable interaction between MYC and nilotinib. The interaction with nilotinib led to the stabilization of a region of the MYC protein that is distorted in apo-MYC and is important for MAX binding. Further analysis of differentially expressed gene revealed that nilotinib, uniquely among the tested TKIs, induced a gene expression program in which half of the genes were known to be responsive to c-MYC. Our findings provide the foundation for subsequent in vitro and in vivo investigations aimed at evaluating the efficacy of nilotinib in managing MYC oncogenic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.