Evidence mapPaperPMID 39081736Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

A Multinational, Multicenter Study Mapping Models of Kidney Supportive Care Practice.

Seren Marsh, Amanda Varghese, Charlotte M Snead, Barnaby D Hole, Daniel V O'Hara, Neeru Agarwal, Elizabeth Stallworthy, Fergus J Caskey, Brendan J Smyth, Kathryn Ducharlet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seren MarshPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Amanda VargheseDepartment of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Charlotte M SneadPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Barnaby D HolePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Daniel V O'HaraNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Neeru AgarwalNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth StallworthyRenal Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, Aotearoa-New Zealand.
Fergus J CaskeyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Brendan J SmythDepartment of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathryn DucharletDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney supportive care (KSC) integrates kidney and palliative care to improve quality of life for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite increasing interest and global advocacy to integrate KSC into kidney care, evidence to guide optimal care delivery is limited. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study used an online survey to describe current KSC models in Australia, Aotearoa-New Zealand, and the UK. Results: Between April and December 2022, 114 nephrology units responded (response rate 67%), with 66% having a dedicated KSC service (UK, 74%; Australia, 58%; and New Zealand, 67%). Many different health care professionals worked in KSC services with diversity in clinical resources and activities between units and across countries. Overall, funding for KSC services was low, with a median full time equivalent (FTE) per unit (standardized per 100 people receiving hemodialysis [HD]) of 0.51 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-1.05) and 4 units provided a service without allocated funding. The scope of KSC service was wide-ranging and prioritized activities included symptom management, psychological support, complex future treatment planning and discussion, and care coordination. There were no significant differences between countries in terms of location of care provision, frequency of review, referral patterns or discharge rates; however, there was variation described within countries. Conclusion: Models of KSC vary markedly across kidney units and between countries. Despite this variation, there was consistency in terms of clinical priorities which were person-centered and focused on physical and psychosocial well-being. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of KSC provision, alongside improved funding methods to ensure sustainable and equitable KSC delivery.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasekidney failurekidney supportive caremodels of carepalliative carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID39081736
PMCPMC11284424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.