ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2024
Transfer Learning for Efficient Intent Prediction in Lower-Limb Prosthetics: A Strategy for Limited Datasets.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vibrotactile Haptic and Gesture Feedback in a Smartwatch for Controlling a Multi-Activity Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025Article
- Ambilateral Activity Recognition and Continuous Adaptation with a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025Article
- Controlling Powered Prosthesis Kinematics Over Continuous Inter-Leg Transitions Between Walking and Stair Ascent/Descent.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a transfer learning method to enhance locomotion intent prediction in novel transfemoral amputee subjects, particularly in data-sparse scenarios. Transfer learning is done with three pre-trained models trained on separate datasets: transfemoral amputees, able-bodied individuals, and a mixed dataset of both groups. Each model is subsequently fine-tuned using data from a new transfemoral amputee subject. While subject-dependent models, trained and tested using individual user data, can achieve the least error rate, they require extensive training datasets. In contrast, our transfer learning approach yields comparable error rates while requiring significantly less data. This highlights the benefit of using preexisting, pre-trained features when data is scarce. As anticipated, the performance of transfer learning improves as more data from the subject is made available. We also explore the performance of the intent prediction system under various sensor configurations. We identify that a combination of a thigh inertial measurement unit and load cell offers a practical and efficient choice for sensor setup. These findings underscore the potential of transfer learning as a powerful tool for enhancing intent prediction accuracy for new transfemoral amputee subjects, even under data-limited conditions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.