Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39081945›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Machine learning in cardiac stress test interpretation: a systematic review.

Dor Hadida Barzilai, Michal Cohen-Shelly, Vera Sorin, Eyal Zimlichman, Eias Massalha, Thomas G Allison, Eyal Klang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Arrhythmias education-current considerations with a focus on ECG teaching].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dor Hadida BarzilaiSami Sagol AI Hub, ARC, Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-2862
Michal Cohen-ShellySami Sagol AI Hub, ARC, Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.
Vera SorinSchool of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel.
Eyal ZimlichmanSami Sagol AI Hub, ARC, Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.
Eias MassalhaLeviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.
Thomas G AllisonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 21 2nd St SW Suite 30, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Eyal KlangSami Sagol AI Hub, ARC, Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading health challenge worldwide. Exercise stress testing is a foundational non-invasive diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, its variable accuracy prompts the exploration of more reliable methods. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML), including deep learning and natural language processing, have shown potential in refining the interpretation of stress testing data. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of ML applications in stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress echocardiography for CAD prognosis. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used as databases. We analysed the ML models, outcomes, and performance metrics. Overall, seven relevant studies were identified. Machine-learning applications in stress ECGs resulted in sensitivity and specificity improvements. Some models achieved rates of above 96% in both metrics and reduced false positives by up to 21%. In stress echocardiography, ML models demonstrated an increase in diagnostic precision. Some models achieved specificity and sensitivity rates of up to 92.7 and 84.4%, respectively. Natural language processing applications enabled the categorization of stress echocardiography reports, with accuracy rates nearing 98%. Limitations include a small, retrospective study pool and the exclusion of nuclear stress testing, due to its well-documented status. This review indicates the potential of artificial intelligence applications in refining CAD stress testing assessment. Further development for real-world use is warranted.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular healthCoronary artery diseaseDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyMachine learningNatural language processingStress echocardiographyStress electrocardiographyStress test

Identifiers

PMID39081945
PMCPMC11284008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.