Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39082168›Full record

ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2024

Deciphering the Causality between Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Poisoning by Narcotics and Psychodysleptics: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Ning Wang, Zhenbo Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ning WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhenbo SuDepartment of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the connection between gut microbiota and poisoning caused by narcotics and psychodysleptics, using Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore possible causal relationships.

methodsThe study employed the MR analysis, leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables to facilitate robust causal inference. Data for gut microbiota was extracted from the MiBioGen study, integrating genome-wide genotyping data with 16S fecal microbiota profiles. Outcome metrics were based on the Finngen study. Genetic instruments were meticulously extracted based on stringent criteria, and harmonized with SNP outcomes associated with "Poisoning by narcotics and psychodysleptics (hallucinogens)". The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized for MR analysis, supplemented by sensitivity analyses including MR-Egger Regression, Weighted Median Approach, and Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation.

resultsAmong various microbial groups, nine showed significant statistical links. Specifically, Class Negativicutes (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.13-15.16, p = 0.0005) and Order Selenomonadales (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.13-15.16, p = 0.0005) were notably associated. These findings were consistent across different sensitivity analyses.

conclusionThe relationship between gut microbiota and the adverse effects of narcotics and psychodysleptics is an emerging area of research. Our MR study identifies certain microbes that might influence the body's response to these substances. These insights could help in predicting and treating the effects of narcotics and psychodysleptics in the future.

Indexed as

DysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeNarcoticsPsychoses, Substance-InducedHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideNarcoticsadverse effect.drug metabolismGut microbiotamendelian randomizationnarcoticspsychodysleptics

Identifiers

PMID39082168
PMCPMC11793043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.