ArticleRedox biology2024
Predicting DNA damage response in non-small cell lung cancer organoids via simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multiharmonic microscopy.
Article in Redox biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting drug-induced nephrotoxicity using simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multiharmonic microscopy.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- An automated image analysis pipeline for wide-field optical redox imaging of patient-derived cancer organoids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Next Generation DNA Damage Response Inhibitors: Harnessing Nanocarriers and Tumor Microenvironment for Precision Cancer Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Engineering immune-competent niches: strategies, applications, and translational hurdles in ovarian cancer organoid models.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Non-small cell lung cancer organoids: Advances and challenges in current applications.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) is a fundamental readout for evaluating efficacy of cancer therapeutics, many of which target DNA associated processes. Current techniques to evaluate DDR rely on immunostaining for phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX), which is an indicator of DNA double-strand breaks. While γH2AX immunostaining can provide a snapshot of DDR in fixed cell and tissue samples, this method is technically cumbersome due to temporal monitoring of DDR requiring timepoint replicates, extensive assay development efforts for 3D cell culture samples such as organoids, and time-consuming protocols for γH2AX immunostaining and its evaluation. The goal of this current study is to reduce overall burden on assay duration and development in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) organoids by leveraging label-free multiphoton imaging. In this study, simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multiharmonic (SLAM) microscopy was used to provide rich intracellular information based on endogenous contrasts. SLAM microscopy enables imaging of live samples eliminating the need to generate sacrificial sample replicates and has improved image acquisition in 3D space over conventional confocal microscopy. Predictive modeling between label-free SLAM microscopy and γH2AX immunostained images confirmed strong correlation between SLAM image features and γH2AX signal. Across multiple DNA targeting chemotherapeutics and multiple patient-derived NSCLC organoid lines, the optical redox ratio and third harmonic generation channels were used to robustly predict DDR. Imaging via SLAM microscopy can be used to more rapidly predict DDR in live 3D NSCLC organoids with minimal sample handling and without labeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.