Evidence mapPaperPMID 39084873Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Primary healthcare professionals' approach to clinical coding: a qualitative interview study in Wales.

Aled Davies, Haroon Ahmed, Tracey Thomas-Wood, Fiona Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting risk of psychosis in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Why coding the modality of primary care consultations matters.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Navigating 'not doing' in primary care: could more explicit guidelines on record keeping help to ease clinician anxiety?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary care health professionals' approach to clinical coding: a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aled DaviesPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-5155
Haroon AhmedDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-0634-8548
Tracey Thomas-WoodCwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-4074
Fiona WoodDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-4074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical coding allows for structured and standardised recording of patients' electronic healthcare records. How clinical and non-clinical staff in general practice approach clinical coding is poorly understood.

aimTo explore primary care staff's experiences and views on clinical coding. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative, semi-structured interview study among primary care staff across Wales.

methodAll general practices within Wales were invited to participate via NHS health boards. Semi-structured questions guided interviews, conducted between February 2023 and June 2023. Audio-recorded data were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 19 participants were interviewed and six themes were identified: coding challenges, motivation to code, making coding easier, daily task of coding, what and when to code, and coding through COVID.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the complexity of clinical coding in primary care. Clinical and non-clinical staff spoke of systems that lacked intuitiveness, and the challenges of multimorbidity and time pressures when coding in clinical situations. These challenges are likely to be exacerbated in socioeconomically deprived areas, leading to underreporting of disease in these areas. Challenges of clinical coding may lead to implications for data quality, particularly the validity of research findings generated from studies reliant on clinical coding from primary care. There are also consequences for patient care. Participants cared about coding quality and wanted a better way of using coding. There is a need to explore technological and non-technological solutions, such as artificial intelligence, training, and education to unburden people using clinical coding in primary care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CodingCOVID-19Primary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleSARS-CoV-2Walesbig dataclinical codingelectronic healthcare recordsgeneral practicequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39084873
PMCPMC11539926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.