ArticleNature communications2024
Genome-wide discovery for biomarkers using quantile regression at biobank scale.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Common and rare genetic variant associations with cognitive performance across development in British birth cohorts.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Gene-Environment Interaction Loci Associated with Refractive Error: SCAMPI Analysis.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Optimizing phenotype scale improves genetic analyses in large-scale biobanks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing polygenic risk prediction by modeling quantile-specific genetic effects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Effect of Yogurt Consumption on Body Fat Percentage in School-Age Children: A Quantile Regression Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Choice of phenotype scale is critical in biobank-based G×E tests.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Distributed quantile regression for big data with missing covariates.Statistics in biosciences · 2026Article
- Computationally efficient whole-genome quantile regression at biobank scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Distributional genetic effects reveal context-dependent molecular regulation in human brain aging and Alzheimer's disease.Research square · 2025Article
- Quantile-specific confounding: correction for subtle population stratification via quantile regression.Genetics · 2025Article
- The integration of quantile regression with 3VmrMLM identifies more QTNs and QTN-by-environment interactions using SNP- and haplotype-based markers.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for biomarkers important for clinical phenotypes can lead to clinically relevant discoveries. Conventional GWAS for quantitative traits are based on simplified regression models modeling the conditional mean of a phenotype as a linear function of genotype. We draw attention here to an alternative, lesser known approach, namely quantile regression that naturally extends linear regression to the analysis of the entire conditional distribution of a phenotype of interest. Quantile regression can be applied efficiently at biobank scale, while having some unique advantages such as (1) identifying variants with heterogeneous effects across quantiles of the phenotype distribution; (2) accommodating a wide range of phenotype distributions including non-normal distributions, with invariance of results to trait transformations; and (3) providing more detailed information about genotype-phenotype associations even for those associations identified by conventional GWAS. We show in simulations that quantile regression is powerful across both homogeneous and various heterogeneous models. Applications to 39 quantitative traits in the UK Biobank demonstrate that quantile regression can be a helpful complement to linear regression in GWAS and can identify variants with larger effects on high-risk subgroups of individuals but with lower or no contribution overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.