ArticleScientific reports2024
Precision improvement of robotic bioprinting via vision-based tool path compensation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Advances in Skin Tissue Engineering: From Physiological Architecture to 3D Bioprinting.Cureus · 2026Review
- Soft Robotics and Advanced Technologies for Minimally Invasive Bioprinting: The Future of Internal Organ Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Functional Nano-to-Microstructures by Jet Printing and Direct Ink Writing.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted smart hydrogel bioinks in 3D bioprinting: design, optimization, and construct validation for functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Informed Hydrogel Biomaterials in Additive Manufacturing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting: Unlocking New Frontiers in Precision and Tissue Fabrication.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- A Critical Review: Gel-Based Edible Inks for 3D Food Printing: Materials, Rheology-Geometry Mapping, and Control.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- High-Precision Multi-Axis Robotic Printing: Optimized Workflow for Complex Tissue Creation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Promise and Challenges of Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering.Micromachines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic 3D bioprinting is a rapidly advancing technology with applications in organ fabrication, tissue restoration, and pharmaceutical testing. While the stepwise generation of organs characterizes bioprinting, challenges such as non-linear material behavior, layer shifting, and trajectory tracking are common in freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) bioprinting, leading to imperfections in complex organ construction. To overcome these limitations, we propose a computer vision-based strategy to identify discrepancies between printed filaments and the reference robot path. Employing error compensation techniques, we generate an adjusted reference path, enhancing robotic 3D bioprinting by adapting the robot path based on vision system data. Experimental assessments confirm the reliability and agility of our vision-based robotic 3D bioprinting approach, showcasing precision in fabricating human blood vessel segments through case studies. Significantly, it minimizes the printing layer width disparity to just 0.15 mm compared to the 0.6 mm in traditional methods, and it decreases the average error for curved filaments to 7.0 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.