Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085464›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Improvement of non-adherence and reduction of BP values in patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension: the ATHAN clinical trial.

Anna Oliveras, Susana Vázquez, María Victoria Vega, Carme Camps, Francisco J Illana, Pedro Armario, Marta Crespo, Alejandro de la Sierra

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna OliverasHypertension Unit, Nephrology Dpt, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. aoliveras@hospitaldelmar.cat.
Susana VázquezHypertension Unit, Nephrology Dpt, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
María Victoria VegaLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme CampsHypertension Unit, Nephrology Dpt, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco J IllanaBiochemistry Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro ArmarioCardiovascular Risk Area, Complex Hospitalari Universitari Moisès Broggi, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta CrespoIMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro de la SierraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension treatment and blood pressure (BP) control reduce cardiovascular disease burden. However, prevalence of controlled BP is overall insufficient and lack of adherence to treatment is a suggested major contributor. This prospective, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether a specific 3-month (m) action plan to improve therapeutic adherence results in a decrease in BP. Patients with ambulatory 24 h-BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving ≥2 antihypertensive drugs and with therapeutic non-compliance confirmed by antihypertensive drugs analyzed in urine were randomized (1:1) to receive a specific 3 m program to improve adherence (INT = intervention) or routine follow-up (C = control). Antihypertensive treatment was not modified and knowledge of non-adherence was only notified to patients randomized to the intervention group. Before randomization and at 3 m all patients underwent urinary screening for antihypertensive drugs and 24 h-ambulatory-BP monitoring. Forty-five patients (36% women, mean age: 58 ± 13 yr) were randomized. At 3 m, mean (95% CI) BP differences (INT vs. C) were 12.2 mmHg (4.3-20.8), adjusted-p = 0.032 and 8.7 mmHg (2.5-14.8), adjusted-p = 0.018 for 24 h-systolic and 24 h-diastolic BP, respectively. Differences (INT vs. C) for office SBP and DBP were 18.4 mmHg (6.8-30.1), adjusted-p = 0.005 and 15.7 mmHg (7.2-24.2), adjusted-p < 0.001. Non-detected antihypertensive drugs were median [IQR]: 40% [25-100] and 0% [0-20] at baseline and 3 m, respectively, in the INT group, and 33.3% [25-63.7] and 33.3% [23.8-57.9], in the C group (p < 0.001 for the 3-month between-group comparison). A combined action plan of notifying knowledge of non-adherence plus a 3-month specific nursing intervention to improve therapeutic adherence results in BP reduction in patients with inadequate therapeutic compliance.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionMedication AdherenceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensive drugsBlood pressure controlTherapeutic adherence

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.