Evidence mapPaperPMID 39085578Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study.

Lurit Bepo, Oanh K Nguyen, Anil N Makam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lurit BepoDivision of Hospital Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. lurit.bepo@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0009-0008-9170-4244
Oanh K NguyenDivision of Hospital Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anil N MakamDivision of Hospital Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

UCSF Older Americans Independence CenterP30AG044281 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · 2025 to 2025
$1.5M
HRSA HHS T32HP19025NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133441NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL133441NIA NIH HHS K23 AG052603NIA NIH HHS K23AG052603NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinority racial and ethnic populations have the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus but lower use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra), novel medications that reduce morbidity and mortality. Observed disparities may be due to differences in insurance coverage, which have variable cost-sharing, prior authorization, and formulary restrictions that influence medication access.

objectiveTo assess whether racial/ethnic differences in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use differ by payer.

designCross-sectional analysis of 2018 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.

participantsAdults ≥ 18 years old with diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: We defined insurance as private, Medicare, or Medicaid using ≥ 7 months of coverage in the calendar year. We defined race/ethnicity as White (non-Hispanic) vs non-White (including Hispanic). The primary outcome was use of ≥ 1 SGLT2i or GLP1ra medication. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the interaction between payer and race/ethnicity adjusted for cardiovascular, socioeconomic, and healthcare access factors. KEY

resultsWe included 4997 adults, representing 24.8 million US adults annually with diabetes (mean age 63.6 years, 48.8% female, 38.8% non-White; 33.5% private insurance, 56.8% Medicare, 9.8% Medicaid). In our fully adjusted model, White individuals with private insurance had significantly more medication use versus non-White individuals (16.1% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001), which was similar for Medicare beneficiaries but more attenuated (14.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.04). Medication rates were similar among Medicaid beneficiaries (10.0% vs 9.0%, p = 0.74).

conclusionsRacial/ethnic disparities in novel diabetes medications were the largest among those with private insurance. There was no disparity among Medicaid enrollees, but overall prescription rates were the lowest. Given that disparities vary considerably by payer, differences in insurance coverage may account for the observed disparities in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use. Future studies are needed to assess racial/ethnic differences in novel diabetes use by insurance formulary restrictions and out-of-pocket cost-sharing.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Healthcare DisparitiesHypoglycemic AgentsAdultAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39085578
PMCPMC11576692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.