ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024
Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination cardiometabolic therapy in type 2 diabetes: optimizing SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP‑1 receptor agonist use.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Nonmedical Factors That Influence Diabetes Complications and Multilevel Strategies to Reduce Disparities and Improve Outcomes in the U.S.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- GLP-1RA Dispensing in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: 2020 to 2023.Pediatrics · 2026Article
- Beyond glycemic control: Sex differences shaping glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist utilization in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- In Pursuit of Person-Centered Medicine: How Do People with Type 2 Diabetes Choose Glucose-Lowering Medications? A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The forgotten - overcoming challenges in diabetes care for marginalized populations.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Review
- Effects of preoperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy on weight loss following bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Factors and Disparities Influencing Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Initiation in the United States: A Scoping Review of Evidence.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Distinct Roles of Common Genetic Variants and Their Contributions to Diabetes: MODY and Uncontrolled T2DM.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Factors Associated With Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Diabetes and Kidney Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Kidney CHAMP Trial.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- SGLT2 Inhibitor and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Prescriptions in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Cardiorenal Risks: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinority racial and ethnic populations have the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus but lower use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra), novel medications that reduce morbidity and mortality. Observed disparities may be due to differences in insurance coverage, which have variable cost-sharing, prior authorization, and formulary restrictions that influence medication access.
objectiveTo assess whether racial/ethnic differences in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use differ by payer.
designCross-sectional analysis of 2018 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.
participantsAdults ≥ 18 years old with diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: We defined insurance as private, Medicare, or Medicaid using ≥ 7 months of coverage in the calendar year. We defined race/ethnicity as White (non-Hispanic) vs non-White (including Hispanic). The primary outcome was use of ≥ 1 SGLT2i or GLP1ra medication. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the interaction between payer and race/ethnicity adjusted for cardiovascular, socioeconomic, and healthcare access factors. KEY
resultsWe included 4997 adults, representing 24.8 million US adults annually with diabetes (mean age 63.6 years, 48.8% female, 38.8% non-White; 33.5% private insurance, 56.8% Medicare, 9.8% Medicaid). In our fully adjusted model, White individuals with private insurance had significantly more medication use versus non-White individuals (16.1% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001), which was similar for Medicare beneficiaries but more attenuated (14.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.04). Medication rates were similar among Medicaid beneficiaries (10.0% vs 9.0%, p = 0.74).
conclusionsRacial/ethnic disparities in novel diabetes medications were the largest among those with private insurance. There was no disparity among Medicaid enrollees, but overall prescription rates were the lowest. Given that disparities vary considerably by payer, differences in insurance coverage may account for the observed disparities in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use. Future studies are needed to assess racial/ethnic differences in novel diabetes use by insurance formulary restrictions and out-of-pocket cost-sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.