Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39085815›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2024

The cultural safety of research reports on primary healthcare use by Indigenous Peoples: a systematic review.

Amandi Hiyare-Hewage, Victoria Sinka, Eleonora Dal Grande, Marianne Kerr, Siah Kim, Kylie-Ann Mallitt, Michelle Dickson, Allison Jaure, Rhonda Wilson, Jonathan C Craig and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amandi Hiyare-HewageFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. Amandi.hiyare@flinders.edu.au.
Victoria SinkaSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Eleonora Dal GrandeFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Marianne KerrCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Siah KimCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Kylie-Ann MallittSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michelle DicksonSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Allison JaureSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Rhonda WilsonDepartment of Nursing, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jonathan C CraigFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jacqueline H StephensFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1183689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity-driven research in primary healthcare (PHC) may reduce the chronic disease burden in Indigenous peoples. This systematic review assessed the cultural safety of reports of research on PHC use by Indigenous peoples from four countries with similar colonial histories.

methodsMedline, CINAHL and Embase were all systematically searched from 1st January 2002 to 4th April 2023. Papers were included if they were original studies, published in English and included data (quantitative, qualitative and/or mixed methods) on primary healthcare use for chronic disease (chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus) by Indigenous Peoples from Western colonial countries. Study screening and data extraction were undertaken independently by two authors, at least one of whom was Indigenous. The baseline characteristics of the papers were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Aspects of cultural safety of the research papers were assessed using two quality appraisal tools: the CONSIDER tool and the CREATE tool (subset analysis). This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool.

resultsWe identified 35 papers from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. Most papers were quantitative (n = 21) and included data on 42,438 people. Cultural safety across the included papers varied significantly with gaps in adequate reporting of research partnerships, provision of clear collective consent from participants and Indigenous research governance throughout the research process, particularly in dissemination. The majority of the papers (94%, 33/35) stated that research aims emerged from communities or empirical evidence. We also found that 71.4% (25/35) of papers reported of using strengths-based approaches by considering the impacts of colonization on reduced primary healthcare access.

conclusionResearch on Indigenous PHC use should adopt more culturally safe ways of providing care and producing research outputs which are relevant to community needs by privileging Indigenous voices throughout the research process including dissemination. Indigenous stakeholders should participate more formally and explicitly throughout the process to guide research practices, inclusive of Indigenous values and community needs.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesPrimary Health CareAustraliaCanadaCultural CompetencyHealth Services, IndigenousHumansNew ZealandUnited StatesChronic diseaseCultural safetyDisseminationIndigenous healthPrimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39085815
PMCPMC11293170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.