Evidence mapPaperPMID 39085976Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024

Comparing regional brain uptake of incretin receptor agonists after intranasal delivery in CD-1 mice and the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Noor Abdulhameed, Alice Babin, Kim Hansen, Riley Weaver, William A Banks, Konrad Talbot, Elizabeth M Rhea

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noor AbdulhameedVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Alice BabinVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Kim HansenVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Riley WeaverVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
William A BanksVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Konrad TalbotDepartments of Neurosurgery, Pathology and Human Anatomy, and Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA. ktalbot@llu.edu.
Elizabeth M RheaVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA. meredime@uw.edu.

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057658NIH HHS RO1AG057658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting brain insulin resistance (BIR) has become an attractive alternative to traditional therapeutic treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Incretin receptor agonists (IRAs), targeting either or both of the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors, have proven to reverse BIR and improve cognition in mouse models of AD. We previously showed that many, but not all, IRAs can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) after intravenous (IV) delivery. Here we determined if widespread brain uptake of IRAs could be achieved by circumventing the BBB using intranasal (IN) delivery, which has the added advantage of minimizing adverse gastrointestinal effects of systemically delivered IRAs. Of the 5 radiolabeled IRAs tested (exenatide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, DA4-JC, and DA5-CH) in CD-1 mice, exenatide, dulaglutide, and DA4-JC were successfully distributed throughout the brain following IN delivery. We observed significant sex differences in uptake for DA4-JC. Dulaglutide and DA4-JC exhibited high uptake by the hippocampus and multiple neocortical areas. We further tested and found the presence of AD-associated Aβ pathology minimally affected uptake of dulaglutide and DA4-JC. Of the 5 tested IRAs, dulaglutide and DA4-JC are best capable of accessing brain regions most vulnerable in AD (neocortex and hippocampus) after IN administration. Future studies will need to be performed to determine if IN IRA delivery can reduce BIR in AD or animal models of that disorder.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsAdministration, IntranasalAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierDisease Models, AnimalExenatideFemaleGlucagon-Like PeptidesHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsIncretinsMaleMiceAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursordulaglutideExenatideGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsIncretinsPresenilin-1PSEN1 protein, humanRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSemaglutideAlzheimer’s diseaseGLP-1Incretin receptor agonistInsulin signalingIntranasal

Identifiers

PMID39085976
PMCPMC11293113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.