Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087084›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Learning three-dimensional aortic root assessment based on sparse annotations.

Johanna Brosig, Nina Krüger, Inna Khasyanova, Isaac Wamala, Matthias Ivantsits, Simon Sündermann, Jörg Kempfert, Stefan Heldmann, Anja Hennemuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johanna BrosigFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4212-647X
Nina KrügerFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-9480
Inna KhasyanovaInstitute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-8504
Isaac WamalaInstitute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias IvantsitsFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-7154
Simon SündermannCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg KempfertCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HeldmannFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Anja HennemuthFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-7375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Analyzing the anatomy of the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) is crucial for risk assessment and planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A comprehensive analysis of the aortic root and LVOT requires the extraction of the patient-individual anatomy via segmentation. Deep learning has shown good performance on various segmentation tasks. If this is formulated as a supervised problem, large amounts of annotated data are required for training. Therefore, minimizing the annotation complexity is desirable. Approach: We propose two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional annotation and point cloud-based surface reconstruction to train a fully automatic 3D segmentation network for the aortic root and the LVOT. Our sparse annotation scheme enables easy and fast training data generation for tubular structures such as the aortic root. From the segmentation results, we derive clinically relevant parameters for TAVI planning. Results: The proposed 2D cross-sectional annotation results in high inter-observer agreement [Dice similarity coefficient (DSC): 0.94]. The segmentation model achieves a DSC of 0.90 and an average surface distance of 0.96 mm. Our approach achieves an aortic annulus maximum diameter difference between prediction and annotation of 0.45 mm (inter-observer variance: 0.25 mm). Conclusions: The presented approach facilitates reproducible annotations. The annotations allow for training accurate segmentation models of the aortic root and LVOT. The segmentation results facilitate reproducible and quantifiable measurements for TAVI planning.

Indexed as

annotationaortic rootleft ventricular outflow tractsegmentationtranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID39087084
PMCPMC11287057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.