Evidence mapPaperPMID 39088060Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Optimal hyperglycemia thresholds in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a cross sectional study of oncologists' practices.

Teresa M Salgado, Poorva B Birari, Mona Alshahawey, Erin Hickey Zacholski, Emily Mackler, Tonya M Buffington, Kerri T Musselman, William J Irvin, Jennifer M Perkins, Trang N Le and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of hyperglycaemia and/or type 2 diabetes on women with breast cancer undergoing or post-cytotoxic chemotherapy: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Diabetes and cancer: glucose control impact on survival and tumor outcomes.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Teresa M SalgadoDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N. 12Th Street PO Box 98053, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. tmsalgado@vcu.edu.
Poorva B BirariDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N. 12Th Street PO Box 98053, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Mona AlshahaweyDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N. 12Th Street PO Box 98053, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Erin Hickey ZacholskiDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N. 12Th Street PO Box 98053, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Emily MacklerMichigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) and Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation (MICMT), 4251 Plymouth Road Arbor Lakes, Building 3, Floor 3, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Tonya M BuffingtonBon Secours Mercy Health, 611 Watkins Centre Parkway, Suite 250, Midlothian, VA, 23114, USA.
Kerri T MusselmanEmcara Health and PopHealthCare, 113 Seaboard Lane, Suite B200, Franklin, TN, 37067, USA.
William J IrvinBon Secours St Francis, 14051 St Francis Blvd Suite 2210, Midlothian, VA, 23114, USA.
Jennifer M PerkinsDivision of Endocrinology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, 400 Parnassus Ave., Suite A-550, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Trang N LeDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St. Sanger Hall Suite 1-030, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Dave L DixonDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N. 12Th Street PO Box 98053, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Karen B FarrisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy Translational Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation (MICMT), University of Michigan, 428 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Vanessa B SheppardDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Resa M JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, and Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Avenue Ritter Annex, 9Th Floor, Suite 917, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.

Funding

American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2022 New Investigator Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeither the United States nor the European oncology guidelines include details for appropriate management of hyperglycemia in cancer patients. The aim was to identify fasting and random blood glucose thresholds, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets used by oncologists in clinical practice when managing hyperglycemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

methodsThis national, cross sectional study utilized a questionnaire to collect oncologists' perceptions about optimal blood glucose thresholds and HbA1c targets in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize glucose thresholds, HbA1c targets, and sample characteristics. Responses to an open-ended question about oncologists' approach to hyperglycemia management were analyzed via thematic analysis using an inductive approach.

resultsRespondents (n = 229) were on average 52.1 years of age, 67.7% men, and 91.3% White. For patients without diabetes but experiencing hyperglycemia, oncologists targeted lower and upper fasting blood glucose levels between 75-121 mg/dL and 105-135 mg/dL, respectively. For patients with diabetes, the targets for lower and upper fasting blood glucose levels ranged between 100-130 mg/dL and 128-150 mg/dL, respectively. Fasting blood glucose (95.6%) and HbA1c (78.6%) were the most commonly used clinical indicators to consider chemotherapy dose reduction, delay, or discontinuation due to hyperglycemia in patients receiving chemotherapy with curative intent. Among those receiving palliative intent chemotherapy, the preferred clinical parameters were random blood glucose (90.0%), patient-reported blood glucose readings (70.7%), continuous glucose monitoring readings (65.1%), and patient-reported symptoms of hyperglycemia (65.1%). Three main themes emerged about oncologists' approach to hyperglycemia management: 1) identification of high-risk patients; 2) need for early identification, screening, and diagnosis of hyperglycemia; and 3) multiple hyperglycemia management strategies.

conclusionOncologists reported a wide variation of target blood glucose ranges considered appropriate in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Lack of clear guidance for hyperglycemia management during chemotherapy in the United States may be contributing to a lack of consistency in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHyperglycemiaNeoplasmsOncologistsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAntineoplastic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHyperglycemiaOncologists [MeSH]Practice Patterns, Physicians’ [MeSH]Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH]

Identifiers

PMID39088060
PMCPMC11294379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.