ArticleGenes & genomics2024
Transposable elements contribute to tissue-specific gene regulation in humans.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- ONT-only genome assembly of a Korean male individual using a semen sample.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransposable elements (TEs) contribute to approximately half of the human genome, and along with many other functions, they have been known to play a role in gene regulation in the genome. With TEs' active/repressed states varying across tissue and cell types, they have the potential to regulate gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. OBJECTIVE AND
methodsTo provide a systematic analysis of TEs' contribution in tissue-specific gene regulation, we examined the regulatory elements and genes in association with TE-derived regulatory sequences in 14 human cell lines belonging to 10 different tissue types using the functional genomics data from the ENCODE project. Specifically, we separately analyzed regulatory regions identified by three different approaches (DNase hypersensitive sites (DHS), histone active sites (HA), and histone repressive sites (HR)).
resultsThese regulatory regions showed to be distinct from each other by sharing less than 2.5% among all three types and more than 95% showed to be cell line-specific. Despite a lower total TE content overall than the genome average, each regulatory sequence type showed enrichment for one or two specific TE type(s): DHS for long terminal repeats (LTRs) and DNA transposons, HA for short interspersed nucleotide elements (SINEs), and HR for LTRs. In contrast, SINE was shown to be overrepresented in all three types of regulatory sequences located in gene-neighboring regions. TE-regulated genes were mostly shown to have cell line specific pattern, and tissue-specific genes (TSGs) showed higher usage of TE regulatory sequences in the tissue of their expression. While TEs in the regulatory sequences showed to be older than their genome-wide counterparts, younger TEs were shown to be more likely used in cell line specific regulatory sequences.
conclusionsCollectively, our study provided further evidence enforcing an important contribution of TEs to tissue-specific gene regulation in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.