Evidence mapPaperPMID 39088450Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Identifying the key components of social support for patients living with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of type 2 diabetes social support interventions.

Reda Madroumi, Lisa Newson, Frederick Kanayo Umeh, Helen Poole, Andrew Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reda MadroumiFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9002-5644
Lisa NewsonFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Frederick Kanayo UmehFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Helen PooleFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Andrew JonesFaculty of Health, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a disease that impacts a huge portion of the world's population. The number of T2D cases is expected to keep rising during the next decade. Committing to the treatment to manage this condition makes participants feel a burden of emotions making them require emotional support from caregivers or close ones. Support from family or caregivers can help improve glycaemia control, medication adherence, and T2D self-management. However, little is known about what aspects of social support effectively improve patients' T2D self-management outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to identify the effective components of social support that can help participants improve their T2D self-management. Methods: The protocol of this review was developed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PRISMA recommendations were applied to develop a search strategy in collaboration with a team of academics to identify relevant T2D social support interventions via healthcare and psychology databases, Medline, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINHAL. Discussion: This review will provide an overview of what intervention social support components have a significant impact on T2D glycaemia control. These findings will inform future T2D interventions on what social support components could be used to encourage better diabetes self-management and glycemic control.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Social SupportSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID39088450
PMCPMC11293637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.