Evidence mapPaperPMID 39088470Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Fostering active choice to empower behavioral change to reduce cardiovascular risk: A web-based randomized controlled trial.

Lorraine L Landais, Judith G M Jelsma, Olga C Damman, Evert A L M Verhagen, Danielle R M Timmermans

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05142280 (Actively Choosing How to Cope With an Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05142280 nacompletednot on this map

Actively Choosing How to Cope With an Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomised Web-Based Experiment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2022 to 2022Enrolled743ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsDecision-aid for cardiovascular disease risk, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorraine L LandaisDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith G M JelsmaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olga C DammanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evert A L M VerhagenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Danielle R M TimmermansDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-3875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of an active choice (AC) intervention based on creating risk and choice awareness-versus a passive choice (PC) control group-on intentions and commitment to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-reducing behavior.

methodsAdults aged 50-70 (n = 743) without CVD history participated in this web-based randomized controlled trial. The AC intervention included presentation of a hypothetical CVD risk in a heart age format, information about CVD risk and choice options, and a values clarification exercise. The PC group received a hypothetical absolute numerical CVD risk and brief information and advice about lifestyle and medication. Key outcomes were reported degree of active choice, intention strength, and commitment to adopt risk-reducing behavior.

resultsMore AC compared to PC participants opted for lifestyle change (OR = 2.86, 95%CI:1.51;5.44), or lifestyle change and medication use (OR = 2.78, 95%CI:1.42;5.46), than 'no change'. No differences were found for intention strength. AC participants made a more active choice than PC participants (β = 0.09, 95%CI:0.01;0.16), which was sequentially mediated by cognitive risk perception and negative affect. AC participants also reported higher commitment to CVD risk-reducing behavior (β = 0.32, 95%CI:0.04;0.60), mediated by reported degree of active choice.

conclusionsFostering active choices increased intentions and commitment towards CVD risk-reducing behavior. Increased cognitive risk perception and negative affect were shown to mediate the effect of the intervention on degree of active choice, which in turn mediated the effect on commitment. Future research should determine whether fostering active choice also improves risk-reducing behaviors in individuals at increased CVD risk in real-life settings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05142280. Prospectively registered.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesChoice BehaviorRisk Reduction BehaviorAgedFemaleHealth BehaviorHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansIntentionInternetLife StyleMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39088470
PMCPMC11293644

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.