Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088483›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Large changes in detected selection signatures after a selection limit in mice bred for voluntary wheel-running behavior.

David A Hillis, Liran Yadgary, George M Weinstock, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, Daniel Pomp, Theodore Garland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A HillisGenetics, Genomics, and Bioinformatics Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7062-7376
Liran YadgaryDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
George M WeinstockThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States of America.
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de VillenaDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel PompDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Theodore GarlandDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-3552

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In various organisms, sequencing of selectively bred lines at apparent selection limits has demonstrated that genetic variation can remain at many loci, implying that evolution at the genetic level may continue even if the population mean phenotype remains constant. We compared selection signatures at generations 22 and 61 of the "High Runner" mouse experiment, which includes 4 replicate lines bred for voluntary wheel-running behavior (HR) and 4 non-selected control (C) lines. Previously, we reported multiple regions of differentiation between the HR and C lines, based on whole-genome sequence data for 10 mice from each line at generation 61, which was >31 generations after selection limits had been reached in all HR lines. Here, we analyzed pooled sequencing data from ~20 mice for each of the 8 lines at generation 22, around when HR lines were reaching limits. Differentiation analyses of allele frequencies at ~4.4 million SNP loci used the regularized T-test and detected 258 differentiated regions with FDR = 0.01. Comparable analyses involving pooling generation 61 individual mouse genotypes into allele frequencies by line produced only 11 such regions, with almost no overlap among the largest and most statistically significant peaks between the two generations. These results implicate a sort of "genetic churn" that continues at loci relevant for running. Simulations indicate that loss of statistical power due to random genetic drift and sampling error are insufficient to explain the differences in selection signatures. The 13 differentiated regions at generation 22 with strict culling measures include 79 genes related to a wide variety of functions. Gene ontology identified pathways related to olfaction and vomeronasal pathways as being overrepresented, consistent with generation 61 analyses, despite those specific regions differing between generations. Genes Dspp and Rbm24 are also identified as potentially explaining known bone and skeletal muscle differences, respectively, between the linetypes.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeMaleMicePhenotypeRunningSelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID39088483
PMCPMC11293672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.