Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090611›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Skill enactment and knowledge acquisition among community users of digital mental health interventions: qualitative study with thematic analysis.

Hayley M Jackson, Philip J Batterham, Jeneva L Ohan, Alison L Calear, Louise M Farrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley M JacksonCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. hayley.jackson@anu.edu.au.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Jeneva L OhanSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Louise M FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE190101382National Health and Medical Research Council 1173146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acquisition of knowledge and use of skills from digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are considered important for effectiveness. However, our understanding of user experiences implementing skills learned from these interventions is limited, particularly outside of research trials. This qualitative study aimed to investigate how community users learn and apply knowledge and skills from DMHIs based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in daily life. The study also examined factors influencing the selection and use of skills and explored perceived changes in mental health resulting from the intervention.

methodsThirteen adults aged 26 to 66 years (10 females) were recruited using social media advertising and participated in semi-structured interviews by telephone or videoconference. All participants were living in Australia and had used a digital CBT program within the past 3 months. Interviews lasted on average 45 min. Transcripts were analysed using theoretical thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants demonstrated high levels of program engagement. Findings were organised into three topics with six major themes. Participants reported that their chosen intervention reinforced existing knowledge and fostered new skills and insights (Topic 1, Theme 1: knowledge consolidation). Most described actively applying skills (Topic 1, Theme 2: active approach to skill enactment), although the extent of learning and range of skills enacted varied across participants. Influences on skill selection included the perceived relevance of intervention strategies to the user's needs and personal characteristics (Topic 2, Theme 1: relevance of intervention strategies), as well as the perceived or experienced effectiveness of those strategies (Topic 2, Theme 2: perceived and experienced benefit). Challenges to ongoing skill enactment included time scarcity, prioritisation difficulties, and lack of motivation (Topic 2, Theme 3: navigating time constraints and low motivation). Improvements in mental health were generally modest and attributed mainly to participants' proactive efforts (Topic 3, Theme 1: perceived changes).

conclusionsDMHIs may reinforce existing understanding of psychotherapeutic strategies, offer new knowledge, and encourage the application of skills in everyday life among community users who actively engage with these interventions. Future research should prioritise personalising DMHIs and investigating methods to optimise the acquisition, retention, and sustained application of knowledge and skills.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineComputer-assisted therapyEngagementInternetQualitativeSkill enactment

Identifiers

PMID39090611
PMCPMC11293152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.