ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Utilizing a multisystemic model of resilience to synthesize research in youth with inflammatory bowel disease: a narrative review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Being a light at the end of the tunnel": Peer mentor experiences on supporting adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2026Article
- Short-Term Effects of Hospital Schooling on the Resilience of Hospitalised Children.Continuity in education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The study of resilience in youth with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is in early stages. The current review aims to illustrate how the use of a multisystemic framework may serve as a developmental and disease-appropriate framework for conceptualizing and designing resilience research for youth with IBD. Methods: This is a narrative review; therefore, a comprehensive and systematic literature search was not conducted. Rather, the current paper aims to map selected existing literature to a multisystemic model as exemplars of how the model may be used in youth with IBD. Relevant literature was reviewed, synthesized, and mapped onto the proposed multi-systemic framework. Key Content and Findings: The current review considers existing literature across three proposed dimensions of resilience: contexts of risk exposure, protective and promotive factors/processes, and desired outcomes. Review of each dimension includes consideration of selected existing literature to explain what is known about each dimension currently, as well as to propose additional potential future areas to broaden understanding. Specific key takeaways include: (I) understanding risk exposure in young people with IBD requires consideration of disease-specific, demographic, and sociocultural factors; (II) protective and promotive factors and processes for these young people span individual, familial, peer, school, and community levels; and (III) desired outcomes encompass both the absence of negative and the presence of positive indicators. Conclusions: A multisystemic approach to the study of resilience in young people with IBD may not only clarify current gaps in the field, but also allow for additional future considerations to best understand how and for whom outcomes characterized as resilient may occur in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.