Evidence mapPaperPMID 39091653Full record

ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Endoscopic vacuum therapy: pitfalls, tips and tricks, insights, and perspectives.

Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Bruno Salomão Hirsch, Pedro Henrique Boraschi Vieira Ribas, Saullo Queiroz Silveira, Hugo Gonçalo Guedes, Alexandre Moraes Bestetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino-Hospital Vila Nova Star, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-0355
Bruno Salomão HirschDeparment of Gastroenteroloy, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7808-5601
Pedro Henrique Boraschi Vieira RibasGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0750-9964
Saullo Queiroz SilveiraDepartment of Anesthesiology-CMA Anesthesia Group, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino-Hospital Vila Nova Star, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6110-5493
Hugo Gonçalo GuedesGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino-Hospital DF Star, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-5059
Alexandre Moraes BestettiGastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino-Hospital Vila Nova Star, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-2169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive review of the use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the management of transmural gastrointestinal (GI) defects (TGIDs) and its future perspectives, such as pre-emptive EVT and novel indications, including GI bleeding and large gastroduodenal ulcers management. This review is based on the available literature data and personal experience to demystify the mentioned limitations of EVT as technical difficulties related to the procedure, possible patients' complaints, and institutions' concerns, by sharing several tips and tricks to overcome EVT-related challenges that may discourage endoscopists from using this live-saving technique, and consequently, restricting patients to receive this therapy, which may lead to undesired outcomes. Several factors, such as placement techniques, EVT type selection, management during its use, EVT system exchanges, device removal, type of anesthesia, and how to avoid EVT-related adverse events are described in detail. Additionally, this review discusses good ways to promote effective communication with patients and relatives, surgeons, and multidisciplinary team. EVT possesses a unique mechanism of action including macro/micro deformation, changes in perfusion (stimulating angioneogenesis), exudate control, and bacterial clearance, promoting healing. EVT has an adequate safety profile and higher clinical success rate compared to any other endoscopic therapy for TGID. Additionally, pre-emptive EVT and its novel indications are promising due to its satisfactory effectiveness in initial studies. Therefore, detailing some practical solutions obtained by years of experience may collaborate to widespread EVT adoption, providing less-invasive treatment for several critical conditions to more patients worldwide.

Indexed as

endoscopyGastrointestinal (GI)leakssurgeryvacuum

Identifiers

PMID39091653
PMCPMC11292076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.