ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2024
Determining amino acid requirements in humans.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amino Acids as Targets for Immunotherapy against Solid Tumors.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Amino Acids as Metabokines in Hypercatabolic States: Rethinking Nutritional Protein-Based Strategies Beyond Caloric Support.Nutrients · 2026Review
- A Factorial Model of the Minimum Metabolic Demand for Protein and Indispensable Amino Acids in Young Adult Males: Implications for Current Recommendations.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Meat Quality of European Flat Oyster Cultivated at Different Distances From Finfish Cages in a Mediterranean Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) System.Aquaculture nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Properties, and Sensory Evaluation of Breadsticks Enriched with Carp Meat (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond Protein Building Blocks: A Review of Biological Roles and Therapeutic Potential of Free Amino Acids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Dietary protein requirements of older adults with sarcopenia determined by the indicator amino acid oxidation technology.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Nutrients and Quality Aspects CharacterizingMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amino acids form the building blocks of body protein. Dietary protein sources provide the amino acids needed, but protein sources vary widely in amio acid composition. To ensure humans can meet body demands for amino acids, amino acid intake recommendations are provided by the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) and by Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU). Current amino acid intake recommendations, however, are based on data collected predominantly from young adult males. The development of the minimally invasive indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method has permitted the evaluation of amino acid requirements in various vulnerable populations. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent amino acid requirement studies in school-age children, pregnant females and the elderly determined using the IAAO technique. These requirements will help to inform evidence-based recommendations that will help to guide dietary guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.