Evidence mapPaperPMID 39091986Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Diabetes in pregnancy and offspring cardiac function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Camilla Bjørn Skovsgaard, Anna Møller, Jesper Vandborg Bjerre, Ulla Kampmann, Kasper Jacobsen Kyng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilla Bjørn SkovsgaardDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anna MøllerDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper Vandborg BjerreDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ulla KampmannSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kasper Jacobsen KyngDepartment of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with impaired offspring cardiac function. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effect of diabetes in pregnancy on cardiac function in the offspring measured by echocardiography. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched from 1992 to June 27, 2023. Studies reporting offspring (age < 18 years) cardiac function by echocardiography compared between any type of diabetes in pregnancy and healthy control pregnancies were included. Study selection, quality assessment and risk of bias was independently performed by two reviewers. Meta-analyses was performed where possible. Results: Thirty-one observational studies were included 1,679 cases and 2,694 controls. In the first week of life (23 studies, Conclusions: Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with cardiac hypertrophy and impaired global cardiac function in infants up to six months old. The few studies reporting on older children found no difference in the parameters investigated. Longitudinal studies employing more advanced echocardiographic measures or MRI are needed to evaluate consequences for long-term cardiac health. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier (CRD42022312471).

Indexed as

cardiac functiondiabetes in pregnancyechocardiographyinfants of mothers with diabetessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39091986
PMCPMC11291373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.