Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092165›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2024

In silico modeling the potential clinical effect of growth factor treatment on the metabolism of human nucleus pulposus cells.

Emily E McDonnell, Tara Ní Néill, Niamh Wilson, Stacey L Darwish, Joseph S Butler, Conor T Buckley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily E McDonnellTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Tara Ní NéillTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Niamh WilsonTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Stacey L DarwishNational Spinal Injuries Unit Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Dublin Ireland.
Joseph S ButlerTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Conor T BuckleyTrinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-4534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While growth factors have the potential to halt degeneration and decrease inflammation in animal models, the literature investigating the effect of dosage on human cells is lacking. Moreover, despite the completion of clinical trials using growth differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5), no results have been publicly released. Aims: The overall objective was to quantitatively assess the effect of three clinically relevant concentrations of GDF-5 (0.25, 1, and 2 mg) as a therapeutic for disc regeneration. Materials and methods: Firstly, this work experimentally determined the effects of GDF-5 concentration on the metabolic and matrix synthesis rates of human nucleus pulposus (NP) cells. Secondly, in silico modeling was employed to predict the subsequent regenerative effect of different GDF-5 treatments (± cells). Results: This study suggests a trend of increased matrix synthesis with 0.25 and 1 mg of GDF-5. However, 2 mg of GDF-5 significantly upregulates oxygen consumption. Despite this, in silico models highlight the potential of growth factors in promoting matrix synthesis compared to cell-only treatments, without significantly perturbing the nutrient microenvironment. Discussion: This work elucidates the potential of GDF-5 on human NP cells. Although the results did not reveal statistical differences across all doses, the variability and response among donors is an interesting finding. It highlights the complexity of human response to biological treatments and reinforces the need for further human research and personalized approaches. Furthermore, this study raises a crucial question about whether these potential biologics are more regenerative in nature or better suited as prophylactic therapies for younger patient groups. Conclusion: Biological agents exhibit unique characteristics and features, demanding tailored development strategies and individualized assessments rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Therefore, the journey to realizing the full potential of biological therapies is long and costly. Nonetheless, it holds the promise of revolutionizing spinal healthcare and improving the quality of life for patients suffering from discogenic back pain.

Indexed as

GDF5growth factorsin silicointervertebral discmetabolismregeneration

Identifiers

PMID39092165
PMCPMC11291302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.