Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092281›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Comparison of clinical outcomes and perinatal outcomes between natural cycle and hormone replacement therapy of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with regular menstruation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Lin Sun, Beining Yin, Zhiyi Yao, Congli Zhang, Jinyu Li, Sichen Li, Yueyue Cui, Fang Wang, Wei Dai, Zhiqin Bu and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin Sun *Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Beining Yin *Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhiyi YaoReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Congli ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jinyu LiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Sichen LiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yueyue CuiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Fang WangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wei DaiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhiqin BuReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yile ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate potential differences in pregnancy outcomes among patients with regular menstruation who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer using natural cycle (NC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 2672 patients with regular menstruation who underwent FET from November 2015 to June 2021 at the single reproductive medical center. A one-to-one match was performed applying a 0.02 caliper with propensity score matching. Independent factors influencing the live birth and clinical pregnancy rates were screened and developed in the nomogram by logistic regression analysis. The efficacy of live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate prediction models was assessed with the area under the ROC curve, and the live birth rate prediction model was internally validated within the bootstrap method. Results: The NC protocol outperformed the HRT protocol in terms of clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. The stratified analysis revealed consistently higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates with the NC protocol across different variable strata compared to the HRT protocol. However, compared to the HRT treatment, perinatal outcomes indicated that the NC protocol was related to a higher probability of gestational diabetes. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis demonstrated independent risk factors for live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. To predict the two rates, nomogram prediction models were constructed based on these influencing factors. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated moderate predictive ability with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.646 and 0.656 respectively. The internal validation of the model for live birth rate yielded an average AUC of 0.646 implying the stability of the nomogram model. Conclusion: This study highlighted that NC yielded higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates in comparison to HRT in women with regular menstruation who achieved successful pregnancies through frozen-thawed embryo transfer. However, it might incur a higher risk of developing gestational diabetes.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo TransferHormone Replacement TherapyPregnancy OutcomePropensity ScoreAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthMenstrual CycleMenstruationPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective Studieshormone replacement therapynatural cyclepredictive modelpregnancy outcomespropensity score matching analysis

Identifiers

PMID39092281
PMCPMC11291223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.