SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2025
A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Machine Learning in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07396792 (Screening for Cardiac and Cardiac-associated Pathology Using Single-channel Electrocardiogram Analyzed With Machine Learning Models), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Screening for Cardiac and Cardiac-associated Pathology Using Single-channel Electrocardiogram Analyzed With Machine Learning Models
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes According to Age and Atrial Fibrillation Type: Insights from the Multicentre REGUEIFA Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent endeavors have led to the exploration of Machine Learning (ML) to enhance the detection and accurate diagnosis of heart pathologies. This is due to the growing need to improve efficiency in diagnostics and hasten the process of delivering treatment. Several institutions have actively assessed the possibility of creating algorithms for advancing our understanding of atrial fibrillation (AF), a common form of sustained arrhythmia. This means that artificial intelligence is now being used to analyze electrocardiogram (ECG) data. The data is typically extracted from large patient databases and then subsequently used to train and test the algorithm with the help of neural networks. Machine learning has been used to effectively detect atrial fibrillation with more accuracy than clinical experts, and if applied to clinical practice, it will aid in early diagnosis and management of the condition and thus reduce thromboembolic complications of the disease. In this text, a review of the application of machine learning in the analysis and detection of atrial fibrillation, a comparison of the outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy), and the framework and methods of the studies conducted have been presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.