ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Machine Learning Meets Physics-based Modeling: A Mass-spring System to Predict Protein-ligand Binding Affinity.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protein-Ligand Docking Simulations for Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputational assessment of the energetics of protein-ligand complexes is a challenge in the early stages of drug discovery. Previous comparative studies on computational methods to calculate the binding affinity showed that targeted scoring functions outperform universal models.
objectiveThe goal here is to review the application of a simple physics-based model to estimate the binding. The focus is on a mass-spring system developed to predict binding affinity against cyclin-dependent kinase.
methodPublications in PubMed were searched to find mass-spring models to predict binding affinity. Crystal structures of cyclin-dependent kinases found in the protein data bank and two web servers to calculate affinity based on the atomic coordinates were employed.
resultsOne recent study showed how a simple physics-based scoring function (named Taba) could contribute to the analysis of protein-ligand interactions. Taba methodology outperforms robust physics-based models implemented in docking programs such as AutoDock4 and Molegro Virtual Docker. Predictive metrics of 27 scoring functions and energy terms highlight the superior performance of the Taba scoring function for cyclin- dependent kinase.
conclusionThe recent progress of machine learning methods and the availability of these techniques through free libraries boosted the development of more accurate models to address protein-ligand interactions. Combining a naïve mass-spring system with machine-learning techniques generated a targeted scoring function with superior predictive performance to estimate pK
Indexed as
Identifiers
39092736What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.